[CI] Auto add license headers to conf files with pre-commit

[jbampton]

Description

This PR is similar to other PRs where license headers have been auto added with pre-commit.

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• Build/CI
• Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

Ran pre-commit run --all-files both before and after the license headers were auto inserted.

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 18.02%. Comparing base (7eea9ed) to head (a9b3b94).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main   #12926   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     18.02%   18.02%           
- Complexity    16464    16465    +1     
=========================================
  Files          5973     5973           
  Lines        537466   537466           
  Branches      65991    65991           
=========================================
+ Hits          96853    96856    +3     
+ Misses       429690   429688    -2     
+ Partials      10923    10922    -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	3.52% <ø> (ø)
unittests	19.18% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[jbampton]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@jbampton a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with no SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 17304

[DaanHoogland]

good work @jbampton , two observations:

1. I think this doesn’t hit production code so blueorangutan is not going to make us wiser.
2. Did you remove any from the exclusion list in the pom.xml (and should we)?